It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Breja: Here's an unconventional idea: learn to spell or stop spamming the forum with this word diarrhea.
Calm down with that. Fairfox isn't breaking any rules with their typing. Please refrain from this kind of comment.If you don't like how they post, don't go into their posts.
Post edited June 20, 2018 by Linko90
avatar
Linko90: Calm down with that. Fairfox isn't breaking any rules with their typing. Please refrain from this kind of comment.If you don't like how they post, don't go into their posts.
avatar
Breja: Very well, but for the record, I belive that being legible should be a rule. Like, the most basic, Law One kind of rule of every forum.
They've used the forum for a while now and their threads get a number of replies. That suggests it is legible, even if it does require an extra read or two.
avatar
Linko90: Calm down with that. Fairfox isn't breaking any rules with their typing. Please refrain from this kind of comment.If you don't like how they post, don't go into their posts.
avatar
PixelBoy: GENERAL RULES:

Use appropriate language.

WE DON’T TOLERATE:

Use of language that is abusive, vulgar, hateful, defamatory, obscene, profane, threatening, privacy-invasive, or law-violating.


Perhaps you should update your rules then.

That kind of typing is not appropriate language as it is violating all grammar and spelling rules on purpose (everyone makes mistakes unintentionally, but it's a stretch to claim that it's all just a series of unintentional typos...), also it can be debated whether that kind of language is abusive or not.

I also challenge to think this: if everyone posted like Fairfox does, and it should be allowed if it's a

llowed for one person, then how would that affect the quality of the conversation here?

I have been to several forums where users have been banned for less.
Are you genuinely trying to frame Fairfox's posts as 'abusive, vulgar, hateful, defamatory, obscene, profane, threatening, privacy-invasive, or law-violating'?

If you can point out an example of this I'd take it into consideration. As long as a topic is clear, even if the writing takes a second read, there are no issues. If I started dishing out punishments for poor typing, we'd be I a never-ending cycle of bans.


As for 'other' forums, they have their rules on their sites, as we have rules on this site.



I hope this clears things up.
avatar
Linko90: Are you genuinely trying to frame Fairfox's posts as 'abusive, vulgar, hateful, defamatory, obscene, profane, threatening, privacy-invasive, or law-violating'?
avatar
drmike: A few days ago you told me bigoted responses from other staff members towards me was acceptable.

I'm still waiting for a follow up by the way. You asked for details. I gave them to you.
Hello DrMike.

You've still yet to inform me what this 'bigoted' response was. Additionally, you have ignored messages on this topic, only to post in this thread.
Post edited June 23, 2018 by Linko90