It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Anyway, i just wrote some post that other people quoted, i've also opened this thread but the result it's still 9.
I am still suspicious of a conspiracy. Maybe all of you are part of!
avatar
seleapi: Anyway, i just wrote some post that other people quoted, i've also opened this thread but the result it's still 9.
I am still suspicious of a conspiracy. Maybe all of you are part of!
Yeah, the forum search just generally sucks. Doesn't always find all the posts / threads that match any given search query...
avatar
adaliabooks: I tried to include this ability in my script, but unfortunately I still can't see a way to search within the threads on a forum (without crashing your browser anyway) to find posts by a user.
Well... There is an easier way. If we had a script that downloaded the entire forums as an external archive, then search that (Using grep most likely)... Or it would be easier to feed that through a filter to then feed to a local SQL database which then can tie everything together using a SQL query... Either way as you say it's going to be more than the job for a simple browser.
avatar
adaliabooks: I tried to include this ability in my script, but unfortunately I still can't see a way to search within the threads on a forum (without crashing your browser anyway) to find posts by a user.
avatar
rtcvb32: Well... There is an easier way. If we had a script that downloaded the entire forums as an external archive, then search that (Using grep most likely)... Or it would be easier to feed that through a filter to then feed to a local SQL database which then can tie everything together using a SQL query... Either way as you say it's going to be more than the job for a simple browser.
Yeah, that was pretty much the conclusion that I came to, download and store the forum (updated regularly like MaGoG does) and then perform the searches on that.
But that seems like a hell of a lot of effort (and space, I know there are probably ways to compress it but I worked out that some of the larger threads alone would take GBs of memory to store...) when GoG could just fix there own search and basically do the same thing with their actual database.
avatar
adaliabooks: but I worked out that some of the larger threads alone would take GBs of memory to store...)
Shouldn't be that much...

Keep in mind i suggest stripping unneeded information leaving only the content intact while html/formatting, images, CCS, javascript, etc, all goes in the trash. Afterwards even simple compression should give high yields.
Post edited December 12, 2015 by rtcvb32
Helping to improve your search results.


"You are all idiots!"

seleapi