Daniel Craig looks like Iorveth. The only differences between them are their voices and craig is way more muscular.

I'm surprised that being from Britain you cannot look beyond Hollywood. Let's acknowledge, Hollywood scriptwriting SUCKS. Big Balls. They haven't done anything but steal, copy and borrow stories from movies from all Over the world, including: Italy, France, Japan and the old Hollywood itself of the 30s to the 70s and 80s for the past decade and when they do something Video Game related is not that good. So far the best attempt was the Prince of Persia and even that was mediocre compered to old Hollywood standards. (Great compared to the sea of crap they put out today)

You should have seen the original POLISH Witcher Series by now. It's on Youtube. There's an extended version of it that was turned into a movie. So your idea doesn't apply. God save us ALL.

To be honest given my own experience I much prefer Polish film making and acting to current CGI gimmick based Hollywood standards. But for that, you require certain level of maturity in taste.

IMHO Hollywood should dissappear from the face of the earth, it will be better for humanity.

The last admirable series that was produced by a Hollywood Company was the Rome series by HBO and even that one had British actors and producers written all over it. I guess is because American Theatre sucks nowadays?

Zebrowski is the same guy that played the hero on the third installment of Zienkewicksz Trilogy right? He's good!!!
+ 1

For some reason I would like main guy from Valhalla Rising to play Geralt:

http://www.fest21.com/files/images/valhallarisingnr2.preview.jpg

What I remember about lotr is that I also say viggo mortensen could play geralt. Only thing that look needed was dying the hair and lots of scars.

+1
That's one insane movie. His character is definitively in the same league.

Mads Mikkelsen. Yeah, he certainly could.

Mads Mikkelsen's breakthrough was in Pusher, where he was supporting actor to Kim Bodnia. Kim Bodnia could be a fine Henselt.

Again, I ask... what's wrong with existing cast?
The problem in the Hexer were not the actors but the special effects and production :)

I remember that once Andrzej Sapkowski was asked, during the interview, what actor he would have liked to play Geralt, if he could choose freely, form all the actors among the world. He answered firmly "Kevin Costner".
However, that was almost 20 years ago, Sapkowski apparently had just watched "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves" http://www.fanlistings.org/kevin_costner/robin_hood.html

Żebrowski's good enough as Geralt (but didn't work due to lack of proper direction). Zamachowski's a great actor, but too ugly for the role of the elf-like Dandelion. Ciri... oh good god, Ciri, that little android... Polish children usually make horrible actors for some reason.

The script was inane and butchered, and the direction was almost non-existent, but that's common knowledge.

I don't think you'd like that at all. We still have some ways to go until fantasy is treated seriously, and not something "for the kids". Hack directors and writers with their own "vision" ahoy.

... and directing, and screenplay. Acting and costumes were the only good things, even filming locations could've been chosen better. It was a terrible movie and series, even best actors can't save a movie with and awful script and directing.

As geth still said.. "we are many"