Anyone playing with ubersampling now.?I'm bearing with the lighting issues and playing with it on crossfire. Lighting isn't bad if u bear with it in caves and just meditate so its day all the time. I get 30-60 fps with some very rare random drops to 18 fps for like 3 seconds with uber and everything maxed out except ssao at 1920 x 1080.

I get 20-25 with ubersampling and SSAO on a GTX570, not worth it so I turned it off. I would rather have SSAO over ubersampling however, SSAO is a huge part of the game's ambience, you're robbing yourself of content by keeping that off. Ubersampling is pretty much just supersampling, you can enable that on any game through drivers, never been a big deal for me and the performance hit is too high.

Mhm...I think the world is much too organical for SSAO to be really noticed. Or do you inspect every single gras holm? ;) With all the normal shadows moving around, the vegetation and such...so I leave it off for some extra fps.

In more "urban" environments, like Dragon Age 2, it's much more noticeable; on the walls for instance.

Im getting 20-70 with both uber and SOAA (random drops and ups from usual 30-60 as well) , but im waiting for light sources fix from AMD and 16:10 patch from CDPR till my second playthrough.
@midnilux
I had the same feeling, that its only supersampling(nVidia) oversampling(AMD), same performance hit. And above all, setting uber in game overwrites setting supersampling from drivers level, witch is bad... cause of that U cant use the middle option Adaptive Multisampling for AMD and there was something for nVidia as well. Both with IQ close to full version and half of performance hit.

German PCGames has stated that the default Ubersampling setting (Ubersampling=2) is 2x2 OGSSAA, so yeah, it's basically 'just' super sampling.

Matt